Mitigation capacity of an eco‑friendly locally sourced surfactant for gas hydrate inhibition in an offshore environment

dc.contributor.authorElechi, Virtue Urunwo
dc.contributor.authorIkiensikimama, Sunday Sunday
dc.contributor.authorAjienka, Joseph Atubokiki
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-05T17:32:22Z
dc.date.available2023-05-05T17:32:22Z
dc.date.issued2021-03-30
dc.description.abstractGas hydrate inhibition is very key and has become more sensitive as oil and gas exploration goes into deeper terrains espe cially deep ofshore as a result of technological advancement. Use of chemicals has been the most efcient and cost efective in these areas. These chemicals add to the cost of doing oil and gas business and also cause harm to the environment; hence, research has been going on for more eco-friendly and cost-efcient inhibitors. This study takes a look at a locally sourced surfactant as one of such inhibitors. Varying weight percentages of the LSS were screened in a locally fabricated laboratory mini fow loop of 39.4 m with an internal diameter of 0.5 inch mounted on an external frame work. The various pressure plots (pressure vs. time, change in pressure vs. time, initial and fnal pressures vs. time) show that the LSS used in very small percentages performed better than the synthetic inhibitor methanol (MeOH) used in higher weight percentage than the LSS. The fnal pressures for MeOH for 1–5 wt% were 104, 111, 123, 120 and 123 psi while those of the LSS were 115, 128, 125, 127 and 131 psi, respectively, for 0.01–0.05 wt%, respectively. This means that the system with LSS had more stable pressure values than those of MeOH. Similarly, the change in pressure at the end of 120 min for MeOH was 46, 39, 27, 30 and 27 psi against 35, 22, 25, 23 and 19 psi for LSS. This was an indication that more gas was used up in the system with MeOH than in the system with LSS. The mitigation capacity of the LSS in percentage was calculated to be 69.30, 80.71, 78.07, 79.82 and 83.3% for 0.01–0.05 wt% while MeOH had values of 59.65, 65.79, 76.32, 73.68 and 76.32% for 1–5 wt%, respectively. This showed that the LSS inhibited hydrates better than MeOH in all the weight percentages considered. There is need to harness and develop the LSS for gas hydrate mitigation because it performed better than MeOH which is a known toxicant to man, terrestrial and aquatic habitat.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipACE: Training, Research and Expertise in Drug Sciencesen_US
dc.identifier.issn2190-0558
dc.identifier.issn2190-0566
dc.identifier.urihttps://datad.aau.org/handle/123456789/1722
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherJournal of Petroleum Exploration and Productionen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Petroleum Exploration and Production;(2021) 11
dc.subjectGas hydrateen_US
dc.subjectLocally sourced surfactanten_US
dc.subjectMethanolen_US
dc.subjectMitigation capacityen_US
dc.subjectLaboratory mini flow loopen_US
dc.subjectOnyewuchi Akarantaen_US
dc.subjectOkon Efong Okonen_US
dc.subjectUniversité de Ouagaen_US
dc.subjectCFOREMen_US
dc.titleMitigation capacity of an eco‑friendly locally sourced surfactant for gas hydrate inhibition in an offshore environmenten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Mitigation capacity.pdf
Size:
827.67 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Main article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections