Comparison and Estimation of Four Infiltration Models
| dc.contributor.author | Atta-Darkwa, Thomas | |
| dc.contributor.author | Antwi, Eric Ofosu | |
| dc.contributor.author | Amankwah, Emmanuel | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-09-21T00:11:20Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-09-21T00:11:20Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020-02-21 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Infiltration is an important component of the hydrological cycle. It provides soil moisture in the vadose zone to support plant growth. This study was conducted to compare the validity of four infiltration models with measured values from the double ring infiltrometer. The parameters of the four models compared were estimated using the linear regression analysis. The C.C was used to show the performance of the predictability of the models. The RMSE, MAE and MBE were employed to check the anomalies between the predicted and the observed values. The results showed that, average values of the C.C ranged from 0.9294 - 0.9852. The average values of the RMSE were 4.0033, 17.489, 11.2400 and 49.8448; MAE were 3.1341, 15.9802, 10.6525, and 61.4736; and MBE were 0.0786, 9.5755, −0.0007 and 47.0204 for Philip, Horton, Green Ampt and Kostiakov respectively for the wetland soils. Statistical results also from the Fisher’s multiple comparison test show that the mean infiltration rate estimated from the Green Ampt’s, Philip’s and Horton’s model was not significantly different (p > 0.05) from the observed. The re sults indicated that the Kostiakov’s model had the highest deviations as it overestimated the measured data in all the plots. Comparison of the statistical parameters C.C, RMSE, MAE, and MBE for the four models indicates that the Philip’s model agreed well with the measured data and therefore, performed better than the Green Ampt’s, Horton’s and Kostiakov’s models respectively in that order for Besease wetland soils. Estimation of infiltration rate by the Philip’s model is important in the design of irrigation schemes and scheduling. Therefore, in the absence of measured infiltration data, the Philip’s model could be used to produce infiltration information for inland valley bottom soils that exhibit similar characteristic as Besease wetland soils | en_US |
| dc.description.sponsorship | ACE: Energy and Environmental Sustainability | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2162-5360 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2162-5379 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2164 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Open Journal of Soil Science | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Open Journal of Soil Science;10 | |
| dc.subject | ACE: Energy and Environmental Sustainability | en_US |
| dc.subject | Wetland | en_US |
| dc.subject | Infiltration Models | en_US |
| dc.subject | Irrigation | en_US |
| dc.subject | Philip’s Model | en_US |
| dc.subject | Ring Infiltrometer | en_US |
| dc.subject | University of Energy & Natural Resources | en_US |
| dc.subject | Ghana | en_US |
| dc.subject | Power | en_US |
| dc.subject | Ankamah Johnson De-Graft | en_US |
| dc.title | Comparison and Estimation of Four Infiltration Models | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |