Morphobiometric Characteristics and Biodiversity of Indigenous Guinea Fowl (Numida meleagris) in Benin
Loading...
Date
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Journal of World’s Poultry Research
DOI
Abstract
The present study aimed to describe the morphobiometric characteristics of indigenous guinea fowl (Numida
meleagris) populations in Benin. The current study was carried out on 1320 (529 males and 791 females) adult (at
least 24 weeks old) indigenous guinea fowls from three climatic zones (Sudanian, Sudano-Guinean, and Guinean) of
Benin. Each guinea fowl was subjected to a direct phenotypic description, biometric measurements, and photography.
The results showed that the plumage coloration of indigenous guinea fowl in Benin was significantly diverse, but the
most widespread plumage colors were pearl grey (30%), black (29.5%), and cinnamon (9.8%). The most common
beak colors were grey (64.9%) and yellow-orange (24.8%). The eyes were predominantly black-white (67.1%). Greyorange
(33.7%), grey (32%), and black-orange (21%) colorations were more represented on the shanks with wattles
relatively dominated by red-white (59.4%) and white-red (30.5%). The average live weight of guinea fowl was 1.34
kg in males which was 4.38% heavier than females. All the biometric measurements were significantly higher in
males. The live weights of guinea fowl in the Sudanian zone (1.40 0.18 kg) were higher than those of guinea fowl
found in the Sudano-Guinean zone (1.27 0.24 kg) and Guinean zone (1.33 0.28 kg). Principal Component
Analysis indicated that three distinct groups of guinea fowl can be formed based on their biometric measurements
(live weight, chest circumference, body length, drumstick length, shank length, shank diameter, and wingspan). The
phenotypes’ diversity was relatively abundant (1-Hill: 0.69) in all climatic zones. The phenotypic biodiversity
observed in the populations of indigenous guinea fowl in Benin can guide farmers to select specific phenotypes to
meet consumer preferences.
Description
J. World Poult. Res., 11(1): 136-150, 2021
Keywords
Citation
DOI: 10.36380/jwpr.2021.18